August 9, 2024
by Soham Jethani, Pankhuri Malhotra and Abhay Raj
in ArticlesKey Takeaways
Introduction
As the global financial landscape evolves with the rise of cryptocurrency, Switzerland stands out as a key player. Known for its robust financial infrastructure, Switzerland offers a welcoming environment for digital assets, but this comes with a complex regulatory landscape that businesses must navigate. This article explores Switzerland’s regulatory environment for crypto businesses, focusing on key regulations, licensing requirements, and the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority’s (“FINMA”) role.
Switzerland’s regulatory environment is overseen by FINMA, a federal body responsible for licensing, supervising, and ensuring compliance among financial institutions. FINMA’s role is crucial in maintaining the financial system’s integrity, with its oversight extending to digital asset businesses operating within Switzerland.[1] The regulatory approach here is technology-neutral and principle-based, applying existing financial market laws to the crypto sector, ensuring that businesses in this space adhere to the same standards as traditional financial institutions.
Switzerland’s regulatory framework for cryptocurrency activities is multi-faceted, covering several key laws designed to ensure financial stability, protect investors, and prevent illicit activities such as money laundering.
In Switzerland, there is no specific, standalone regulation governing crypto businesses. Instead, FINMA applies existing financial market regulations to crypto assets based on their economic function. Businesses involved in the crypto sector may require one or more of the following licences:
Switzerland’s regulatory framework also addresses asset tokenisation through the introduction of DLT securities under the DLT Act.[14] These securities allow for the digital representation of rights, claims, and financial instruments on a blockchain. The legal recognition of DLT securities provides a solid foundation for asset tokenisation, making Switzerland a leader in the development of blockchain-based financial products.[15]
FINMA categorises tokens into three main types: payment tokens, utility tokens, and asset tokens.[16] Each type of token is subject to different regulatory requirements:
Switzerland does not have specific tax legislation for crypto assets, meaning general tax principles apply. The taxation of crypto assets depends on the specific characteristics of the tokens and varies across different cantons. The federal corporate income tax is levied at a flat rate of 8.5%,[17] with cantonal rates varying significantly. The Canton of Zug, known as “Crypto Valley,” offers one of the lowest tax rates in the country, making it an attractive location for crypto businesses.
Switzerland’s regulatory environment is more stringent than that of other jurisdictions, but it offers the highest level of reputation and legal certainty. The timeline for obtaining licences is longer, and the cost is higher, but these factors are offset by the stability and credibility that come with operating in Switzerland.
Switzerland’s regulatory landscape for crypto businesses is both comprehensive and complex. While it offers a high level of legal certainty and a robust framework for digital assets, navigating this landscape requires careful planning and a thorough understanding of the relevant laws and regulations. For crypto businesses willing to invest the time and resources, Switzerland presents an unparalleled opportunity to operate within one of the world’s most reputable and stable financial environments.
Switzerland v the UAE – A Comparison
Aspect | Switzerland | UAE | Which Wins? |
Regulatory Approach | Traditional and stringent, applying existing financial market laws to crypto assets. High legal certainty but less flexibility. | Innovation-friendly and flexible, with multiple specialised regulators. Proactive and supportive of new business models. | UAE wins for flexibility and supportiveness. |
Licensing Process | Longer and more complex, with some licences taking 18-36 months to obtain. Requires significant capital. | Generally faster and more streamlined, with FinTech licences obtainable in 6-9 months. Lower entry barriers. | UAE wins for speed and ease of obtaining licences. |
Regulatory Certainty | High, with a stable and well-established legal framework. Less frequent updates but very predictable. | High, but more adaptive with frequent updates to align with industry changes. Regulatory sandboxes available. | Switzerland wins for predictability; UAE wins for adaptability. |
Taxation | Corporate income tax ranges from 12% to 20%, depending on the canton. Lower taxes in Zug (Crypto Valley). | No income, capital gains, or withholding tax. Corporate tax capped at 9% and VAT at 5%. More cost-effective overall. | UAE wins for tax efficiency. |
Regulatory Support | Formal and less personalised. Businesses must conform to existing regulations with less scope for dialogue with regulators. | Highly personalised support, with close engagement between regulators and businesses. Use of regulatory sandboxes. | UAE wins for personalised support and adaptability. |
Market Reputation | Long-established financial hub with a high global reputation. Particularly strong in traditional finance sectors. | Rapidly growing reputation as a leading hub for crypto and digital assets. Strong in innovation sectors. | Switzerland wins for traditional finance. |
Licensing Cost and Requirements | High capital requirements and higher costs associated with lengthy licensing processes. | Generally lower capital requirements and costs associated with quicker licensing processes. | UAE wins for lower costs and requirements. |
Innovation Ecosystem | Strong, but more aligned with traditional finance. Innovation within existing frameworks. | Highly innovation-driven with specific frameworks for emerging technologies like blockchain and crypto. | UAE wins for fostering innovation. |
Legal Framework | Technology-neutral, applying the same laws to digital and traditional assets. This ensures consistency but can limit flexibility. | Specialised laws for different types of digital assets, allowing for more tailored regulation. | Switzerland wins for having a more dependable legal framework. |
***
[1] FINMA grants licences to and supervises almost all types of financial intermediaries, including in the crypto space such as banks, fintech companies, securities firms, insurance companies, collective investment schemes, payment systems, stock exchanges, multilateral trading facilities, central securities depositories, collective asset managers, fund companies.
[2] 955.0 Federal Act of 10 October 1997 on Combating Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing in the Financial Sector (Anti-Money Laundering Act, AMLA), <https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/1998/892_892_892/en>. This is supplemented with the Swiss Anti-Money Laundering Ordinance and FINMA Anti-Money Laundering Ordinance.
[3] Article 2a, 958.1 Federal Act of 19 June 2015 on Financial Market Infrastructures and Market Conduct in Securities and Derivatives Trading (Financial Market Infrastructure Act), <https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/2015/853/en>.
[4] Federal Act on the Adaptation of Federal Law to Developments in Distributed Ledger Technology, <https://www.newsd.admin.ch/newsd/message/attachments/60601.pdf>.
[5] Banks and Securities Firms Authorisation, FINMA, <https://www.finma.ch/en/authorisation/banks-and-securities-firms/>.
[6] Article 1a, The Swiss Federal Act on Banks and Savings Banks.
[7] FinTech Financial Services Providers, Authorisation, FINMA, <https://www.finma.ch/en/authorisation/fintech/>.
[8] A further requirement is that an institution with a FinTech licence (persons under Article 1b of the Banking Act) must be a company limited by shares, a corporation with unlimited partners or a limited liability company and must have its registered office and conduct its business activities in Switzerland. Guidelines for FinTech licence applications according to Article 1b of the Banking Act, <https://www.finma.ch/en/~/media/finma/dokumente/dokumentencenter/myfinma/1bewilligung/fintech/weg_bewilligungfintech_20230505.pdf?sc_lang=en&hash=4F17B88E957184B11FC72F20CB47EC1A>.
[9] Professional financial intermediaries pursuant to Art. 2 para. 3 of the Anti-Money Laundering Act (AMLA) must join an SRO recognised by FINMA in accordance with Art. 14 para. 1 AMLA.
[10] Licensing as a DLT trading facility, FINMA, <https://www.finma.ch/en/authorisation/fintech/dlt-handelssystem/>.
[11] The DLT-Law introduced a new type of negotiable securities, called “DLT-Securities” that allows for the tokenisation of rights, claims and financial instruments, such as bonds, shares, structured products or derivatives.
[12] Portfolio managers and trustees, FINMA, <https://www.finma.ch/en/authorisation/portfolio-managers-and-trustees/>.
[13] Licenced and authorised by FINMA.
[14] DLT Act, <https://www.newsd.admin.ch/newsd/message/attachments/60601.pdf>.
[15] The DLT-Law introduced a new concept of DLT-Securities under the Swiss Code of Obligations.
[16] Guidelines for enquiries regarding the regulatory framework for initial coin offerings (ICOs) published on 16 February 2018, <https://www.finma.ch/en/~/media/finma/dokumente/dokumentencenter/myfinma/1bewilligung/fintech/wegleitung-ico.pdf?la=en>.
[17] The tax level could also be changed since Corporate Income tax is deductible from taxable income, thereby reducing the taxable income base.
© 2024 TLP Advisors