April 16, 2026
KEY TAKEAWAYS
INTRODUCTION
The Capital Market Authority of the United Arab Emirates (“CMA“) has issued the CMA’s Board of Directors Resolution No. (04/Chairman) of 2026 Concerning the Regulation of Virtual Asset Service Providers and the Alternative Trading System Operator (the “Resolution“), accompanied by three dedicated rulebooks governing the conduct, licensing, and operations of Virtual Asset Service Providers (“VASPs“) in the UAE. This Resolution marks a significant regulatory milestone in the UAE’s evolving virtual assets landscape, consolidating and modernising the existing framework into a more robust and comprehensive regime tailored to the growing complexity of the virtual asset ecosystem.
WHAT THE RESOLUTION REPEALS
The issuance of the Resolution includes a deliberate and structured repeal of the previous regulatory architecture governing VASPs under the CMA’s remit. Specifically, the Resolution repeals and supersedes the following:1Article 6 of CMA Resolution No. (04/Chairman) of 2026.
The Resolution now provides a dedicated and self-contained regulatory framework for VASPs, supported by the following three accompanying modules:4 Article 1 of CMA Resolution No. (04/Chairman) of 2026.
LICENSING UNDER THE NEW REGIME
A. Overview of Licensed Activities
Under the previous regime, virtual asset activities required a Category 7 licence from the CMA, with the following three licensed activities: (i) operation of virtual asset platforms; (ii) brokerage services in virtual assets; and (iii) custody of virtual assets.
Article 12 of the General Module now enumerates eight distinct financial activities for virtual asset service providers, each with its own defined scope, licensing category and capital requirement. The eight licensed virtual asset activities have been defined below:
In addition to those activities which were regulated under the previous regime, the new regime introduces dedicated regulatory treatment for provision of investment advice, portfolio management, and arranging of investment transactions as standalone VASP activities. It also introduces the concept of the operation of a Multilateral Trading Facility as a specifically regulated activity under the VASP framework, replacing the broader “platform operator” concept with a more technically precise construct aligned with international standards.
Notably, this approach aligns with the model adopted by the Financial Services Regulatory Authority of the Abu Dhabi Global Market and the Virtual Asset Regulatory Authority in Dubai, with clearly delineated activity-specific virtual asset services, instead of subsuming virtual asset services under existing securities framework. This granular classification accounts for the particularities of virtual assets, while allowing the regulator to licence virtual asset services with the rigors of the traditional securities framework.
It is also significant to note what the new framework expressly excludes from licensed activity. The Resolution prohibits, without exception, all activities relating to privacy tokens and privacy devices13 Article 5 of the General Module. as well as activities relating to algorithmic tokens.14 Article 6 of the General Module. The Resolution also restricts activities involving utility tokens and non-fungible tokens, permitting only entities licensed to provide custody or operate an MTF to provide services related to such tokens, and only with prior approval from the CMA.15 Article 7 of the General Module.
B. Capital Requirements
The CMA has organised the eight activities enumerated above into six licensing categories, with capital requirements calibrated to the nature and risk profile of each activity.16 Article 21 of the General Module. Crucially, the framework distinguishes between entities that do not hold client assets and those that do, imposing materially higher capital requirements on the latter. Where multiple activities or categories are combined, the highest applicable capital requirement prevails. The full capital structure under the new regime is set out in the table below:
Two important additional points bear mention. First, Article (21)(3) of the General Module clarifies that holding client assets is not automatically permitted by virtue of a licence, as it mandates a separate prior endorsement from the CMA for holding client assets, in addition to fulfilling the detailed client asset obligations set out in Business Regulation Module. Second, Article (21)(5) confirms that the minimum capital thresholds set out above are a floor only. Licensed entities must, on a continuing basis, satisfy all capital adequacy requirements prescribed under the Capital Adequacy Module under the CMA’s Financial Activities Rulebook.
C. Required Personnel
All VASPs are required to appoint designated persons to perform the required regulatory functions at all times.17 Article 54 of the General Module. The table below outlines the required positions (including technical personnel), along with the corresponding regulatory requirements. Further, these roles may be combined, provided that the staffing remains appropriate to the nature, size and complexity of the business, the persons possess the competence to perform their role(s), and there is no conflict of interest.
In practice, the role combination rules mean a VASP can be staffed with as few as four individuals to satisfy all mandatory positions applicable to all licensed entities. Additional personnel are required depending on the VASP’s licensed activities (see table below). Role combinations are permitted only where staffing remains appropriate to the nature, size and complexity of the business, individuals possess the competence to perform all relevant roles, and no conflict of interest arises.
★ Role must be held by a UAE resident. ✓ Subject to accreditation approval by the CMA. ✗ Accreditation not required.
D. Licensing Process
The new regime follows the same two-stage licensing process as the old regime.
For operators of alternative trading systems, the process for licensing under the Alternative Trading System Module remains the same.21 Part 2 and 4 of the Alternative Trading Systems Module. They are, however, largely exempt from the General Module and are required to demonstrate compliance with the extensive obligations under the Alternative Trading Systems Module.
E. Fees and Timeline
The timeline for the licensing application under the new VASP regime is as follows:22 Articles 26 and 74 of the General Module.
The applicant entity must pay a non-refundable fee for the in-principle approval application23 Article 24 of the General Module. and the licensing application,24 Article 75 of the General Module. as determined by the CMA. Once the license is issued, the licensed entity must pay a license fee for each financial activity that it wishes to conduct. The licence will be valid for one year, and upon its expiration, it can be renewed for a subsequent period of one year by paying the renewal fee, as stipulated by the CMA.25 Article 88 of the General Module.
CONCLUSION
The Resolution, together with its accompanying rulebooks, establishes a renewed and detailed licensing and supervisory framework for VASPs operating within the CMA’s jurisdiction. It represents a decisive shift towards a more mature, structured, and risk-sensitive regulatory regime for VASPs in the UAE. It reflects the UAE’s continued commitment to positioning itself as a leading global hub for digital finance and virtual asset innovation, one that balances market development with investor protection and systemic integrity.
By replacing a fragmented framework with a comprehensive, standalone system, the CMA has clarified licensing categories, expanded the scope of regulated activities, and strengthened prudential and operational requirements. This reform not only enhances investor protection and market integrity but also reinforces the UAE’s ambition to position itself as a leading global hub for virtual asset innovation, grounded in regulatory clarity and institutional robustness.
***
DISCLAIMER: This article is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional legal counsel tailored to their specific circumstances. The analysis presented herein reflects the authors’ interpretation of legal developments as of the date of publication and may not reflect subsequent changes in law or regulation.
At TLP Advisors, we are a legal consulting firm specialising in tokenised finance, agentic financial systems, digital assets, and emerging technologies. With deep roots in the financial services, Web3, and broader technology sectors, we offer unparalleled expertise and tailored support to navigate the unique challenges and opportunities of these rapidly evolving industries. TLP Advisors has consistently been the firm of choice for web3, fintech and other financial services companies. We have built a reputation for guiding clients through complex regulatory landscapes while supporting the development of innovative and compliant financial platforms.
***
© 2025 TLP Advisors